Monday, May 20, 2013

20 May 2013: Amelia's First Birthday

Farm Day at School
Mother's Day
Last Day of School Term
Smelling the roses!
First birthday!
Dancing around with Hannah
One year old
Bye bye!
Birthday Cake
Coming out to the party
Hannah, Amelia and friend Tye
Decorated dining room!
Not sure about the hat
Blowing out the candle
Mmm, cake
More cake
MORE cake!
Time for the false moustaches
LuAnn enjoyed this far too much
photo time!
Opening presents
Aquadoodle all the way from Salisbury!
Books books books - Amelia is starting to really like books

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

11 December 2012: Jingle

Time for the annual Christmas video. This time it's Hannah deciding to be camera-shy - normally she belts out 'Jingle Bells' at full volume, but bring out the camera and it's another story...



Happy days!

Sunday, October 28, 2012

27 October 2012: Yates

Sean Yates tells Bradley Wiggins how to correctly bowl an off-break during this year's Tour De France
The Sunday Telegraph reports that Sean Yates has left Team Sky due to unspecified past doping stuff. Sky have had a zero-tolerance policy introduced and it appears that Yates and a few others are the victims of the cull. (Use of the word 'victim' only in the sense of the image of a cull, those who have left have left because of links to drugs, which is entirely their own fault).

Two things.

Firstly, the Telegraph reports that "the exact nature of the doping has not been revealed" before going on to detail the fact that Yates rode with Lance Armstrong for several years in the early part of Armstrong's career. Sounds like a red herring to me, all you have to do is look at Yates' wikipedia page and there's a link to his little-publicised-but-I-certainly-remember-it doping failure in 1989 - have a look at the bottom of this page. And then translate it into English:

"Sean Yates, the British, winner runner of the Belgium Tower and the GP Eddy Merckx, suffered a doping control was positive at the end of half first step of Torhout - Werchter Classic held August 9 between Geel and Verviers. Yates had won the stage before re-offending, the afternoon in Charleroi, endorsing at the time of the race leader's Jersey."

Not fantastic translating, but you get the idea. I remember seeing it reported in The Times when it happened, and I remember the feeling of deflation as I realized that one of the very very few British world-class cyclists at the time had doped.

Second thing is the one that doesn't need translation. The headline for the version of this (2012) story in L'Equipe, the French publication, reads as follows:

"Cyclisme - Dopage : Yates quitte Sky"

Glorious how similar all our languages really are, isn't it? All together now, "fetchez la vache!"

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

10 October 2012: Appendix K


So while the world shakes its head about Mr Armstrong (and, it looks, quite rightly too), those of us with interest in actually reading the huge tome released by the USADA covering their "Reasoned Decision" to strip Lance of his seven Tour titles have been getting into the PDF.

It seems thorough but some items seem far more important in their implications that others. Of particular interest is the section beginning on page 129, which is entitled: "How Lance Armstrong and the USPS Team Avoided Positive Drug Tests". It covers the almost comedic attempts to run away and hide when the testers came, which seems far too ameteur an approach given the forensic nature of the doping programs described, but also hints at (but does not investigate or provide further evidence for) the much more damning idea that the management of the USPS team knew in advance -sometimes days in advance - when the testers were coming. And that is where deeper questions lie, regarding the complicity or otherwise of the UCI in the whole process, moles in the system and perhaps - not wishing to be taken to court by Pat McQuaid myself - just perhaps hints that things went right to the top. But the report stops short of investigating those leads, presumably because it's out of scope for the Armstrong-specific case under discussion.

Of most interest to me though, as a saddened yet ever hopeful fan of cycling and the Tour in particular, is Appendix K. As I mentioned earlier in the year, it has been becoming apparent for some time as the net closed around Mr Lance that every Tour winner from 1996 to 2010 (except for the 'weak field, what do you expect?' 2008 winner Carlos Sastre) was involved, to some extent or another, in some drug/doping stuff. Appendix K not only covers that (although it's slightly out-of-date - it doesn't cover the final verdict in Contador's case) but also covers the second and third placed finishers in the Tours for those years. And guess what? Quoting from the main report:

"Twenty of the twenty-one podium finishers in the Tour de France from 1999 through 2005 have been directly tied to likely doping through admissions, sanctions, public investigations or exceeding the UCI hematocrit threshold. Of the forty-five (45) podium finishes during the time period between 1996 and 2010, thirty-six (36) were by riders similarly tainted by doping."

Appendix K covers all these cases and just shows how widespread it was during this period. As the report states again and again (probably why it's 201 pages long), it wasn't individuals doping for success, it was whole teams doping at the team level.

Final note: David Millar, whom I respect more than almost any other commentator on the subject as he was one of the first to actually confess to doping and has done so much since to stand against it, is reading the report as I write this and is tweeting his responses as he comes up with them, and aside from a few of his usual expletives the most profound is this:

"It's all so sad."

 

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

21 August 2012: Bonification

Despite the flurry of Tour De France blogs and the continuing interest in the donkeys (never had so many hits on the blog in its eight years), time to move them from the top in favour of a couple of new photos. First one was discovered while reviewing Amelia's hospital photos from when she was first born, which just seems to invite a funny caption:


Initial thought something like "Now, are you Hannah or Amelia?"

Second, Hannah jumping in the muddy puddles (or the puddy muddles, whichever you prefer):



 - reminded me of a similar picture from the original Winnie The Pooh books as drawn by Mr Shepherd:



Finally, an explanation of the title of this blog entry: while following a little of the Vuelta (and wasn't it interesting how Contador was able to streak away up that mountain yesterday... six attacks before finally settling down) I've frequently heard Sean "It Certainly Is" Kelly talk about "bonifications". Given Kelly's normal approach of using standard cycling language even if it's not English ("classement" being the exemplar) I thought he was just making it up.

But no - bonification is a real word, meaning either betterment or the paying of a bonus. Kelly uses it in the context of time bonuses awarded to riders who finish first in a stage or in a sprint ("Valverde would be keen get the bonification for finishing first") which appears to be roughly correct.

So there it is, word of the day. Bonification. Use it as much as possible in any context available.

Postscript: Naturally, Blogger's spell checker doesn't recognize "bonification" and suggests "bifurcation" as an alternative. Which to my mind is every bit as obscure.

Monday, July 23, 2012

23 July 2012: Donkeys

Occasionally it appears that this blog gets a run of hits from a particular Google search. In the past this has been "Plymouth beach" (eh?), "Wee Heavy And A Half Pint" and, over the last few days, "Tour De France donkey jerseys".

So, despite the excitement over a British winner of the Tour (and a British second place), along with seven (yes SEVEN) British stage wins by four different riders (and only three of those wins by Mark Cavendish), it appears that the interest here is less on my hard-nosed twenty-five-years-following-the-tour analysis and more about whether I have the best pictures of those donkeys. So before we get to a quick run-down of what happened and what will happen, here's your full 'donkeys in Tour De France jerseys' photoshoot (click on images to see them full size):

First up the donkeys are picked up by the helicopter camera with 17.7 km left on Friday's stage... Sagan in green, Wiggins in yellow and Voeckler in the Mister Tumble's Spotty Tour De France Jersey.


As the peloton flashes past, the donkeys sense the directional momentum and try to join in. Wiggins, naturally, takes the lead.


Then one of the donkeys (probably Voeckler) realises that they're on TV so they'd better pose for the camera.

And so finally we get the picture from Friday. Voeckler, by the way, clearly needs a haircut.

The final day of racing went as expected, of course - Wiggins unchallenged in yellow, Froome taking a comfortable second and Cavendish winning the Paris stage for the fourth year in a row (nobody has ever won it twice in a row before). And despite all the speculation during the tour about 'will Froome go to another team to try and win the race', the post-race headlines were along the lines of 'Sky boss Dave Brailsford says Mark Cavendish can leave'.

And so here we go with the same thing as last year, when I said I hoped Cav wouldn't go to Sky because, exactly as we've seen this month, Sky are interested primarily in the yellow jersey, and beyond that primarily in Wiggo. Froome is heir-apparent - and unless something weird happens I think he will probably stay with Sky, given the salaries, training facilities etc that are available. But he will be strongly, strongly courted by other teams who want (1) his cycling ability and (2) his inside knowledge on Sky's training regimes.

But for Cav, he has surely got to go somewhere else. Sky gave a little support on Friday and Sunday (and he won both), and even despite having almost no help during the tour and having to stretch that World Champion jersey to squeeze in all the bottles he had to carry for the rest of the team (is it just me, or is that a little demeaning for the World Champion?) he still won three stages, equal-most of anyone in the tour this year. With protection he would probably have won at least two more, with last year's HTC Leadout Express he'd have maybe won more (and not just because Matt Goss was in the train).

Cav joined Sky because it's Olympic year, let's be honest. Much easier to get full support from Team GB when you realise it's actually just Team Sky under a different name. But next year, he needs to get back to being in a team where he's the leader.

And here's the other thing: for all the attention Wiggins is getting (quite rightly too, it's pretty historic from a British perspective), Wiggins should go down in history as being remembered as one of the all-time great Olympic champions - six medals, three gold, and more to follow in the next few days. In Tour De France terms he's a Carlos Sastre or a Pedro Delgado - good rider, but only won it once (by the way, it's hard to think of that one-time-winner list without thinking of the druggy riders like Riis, Ullrich, Pantani, Landis et al). Even Steven Roche won the world champs and Tour De France in the same year, and I don't see that on Wiggo's radar right now, although maybe I'm wrong.

Wiggins, right now, is a one-time Tour winner. Next year the course probably won't be so suited to his strengths, he'll be 33, Contador and Schleck (A) will be back, Froome will be chomping at the bit (whether at Sky or elsewhere) - it'll be tougher to defend. If he does win next year, then we definitely have something more like a 'great' on our hands with Wiggo. But right now, in Tour terms, he's won it once.

And then you have Cavendish, who on Sunday took his twenty-third stage win to move fourth in the overall record books, overtaking the only other sprinter in those books (Andre Darrigade) and a certain Lance Armstrong. He's now two stage wins behind Leducq and after that it's only Hinault and Merckx to beat. As discussed earlier, nobody has ever won the Champs Elysees stage even twice in a row, but Cav has now done it four times back-to-back. In Mark Cavendish, even if his career finished today, we're talking in terms of all-time records and the immortals of the sport. Wiggins isn't there yet in terms of road racing.

Defend the Tour successfully and maybe we then begin to talk in those terms.

Finally, as Andy points out, this tour really does appear to be pretty clean. As the net closes on Lance Armstrong and it becomes apparent that every tour winner from 1996 (Riis) to 2006 (Landis) was juiced, and with the 2007 and 2009 winner (Contador) currently serving a drugs ban, it may actually be that we're finally moving away from the drug-dominated arena. How can you know unless you are inside the team? Well, there are a few pointers:

1. The BBC stats show that Andy linked to talked to people who suggest the numbers output by this year's riders are much more consistent with lab-tested results given by riders - often at least 10% lower power/weight ratio outputs than ten years ago.
2. Also the stages - and certain mountain stages in particular - are slower. And this with all of Sky's increased technology and Wiggo's streamlined sideboards.
3. Haemoglobin levels are also now lower across the board, suggesting no more direct transfusions of the type Armstrong is accused of, nor EPO (David Millar's drug of choice in 2003). And this despite Sky's crazy Tenerife experiment where they tried all that altitude sleeping and sea-level training stuff.
4. Most importantly, Phil Liggett says it's cleaner now. I know that sounds weird (this from a man who talks about dancing on the pedals and having a suitcase of courage), but you get certain vibes off people and teams, and Liggett is one of those who is close enough, and experienced enough, to know the difference.
5. Similarly, David Millar has also openly stated that he believes Wiggins is clean, and that's pretty telling given that Millar co-created the Slipstream (now Garmin) team specifically to show that you can race at the top level without drugs. Millar's word counts for a lot I think.

Anyway, enough waffle, Olympic road race on Saturday and provided Cavendish hasn't totally fallen out with the Brailsford/Wiggins axis by then he may still be in with a shout of a medal. After that, it's open season. Now, which team might have two point four million dollars to buy out his contract?

Eh? Who said Saints?


Friday, July 20, 2012

20 July 2012: Wiggo


Despite the picture above, it is Bradley Wiggins and not a donkey who owns the yellow jersey following the end of the mountains in this years Tour.

Mark Cavendish won today's stage - coming from nowhere (with Wiggins' assistance) to overtake a breakaway right on the line. A comfortable warm up for Sunday in Paris and then the Olympics next weekend. He moves up to 22 all-time wins, now level as the best-ever sprinter and moving up the list of all riders. While Wiggins gets great attention (and rightly so) for his achievement, the fact is he's won the Tour once now, while Cav is busy breaking all-time records in the race.

Still, barring accidents (and we've seen a few of those) or some weird time trial result, Wiggo wins the Tour, the first ever overall winner for Britain. And of course if he fails, Chris Froome takes over. So either way, a Sky/British winner is prety much guaranteed from here.

Detractors will say it's like 2008, a weak race with the best racers not present. Standard response is 'well, you can only win the race in front of you' by the opposite-of-detractors. (What is the opposite of a detractor? A protractor?) The record books will say that in 2012 Bradley Wiggins won the tour, just like they say the 2008 version was won by Carlos Sastre.

Would he have beaten Contador, Schleck (A), Froome on any hypothetical different team, Cadel Evans without stomach bug? Hard to say. Wiggins and the Sky train were strong but had no real acceleration - you could just see the likes of Armstrong, Contador etc racing off up the mountains into the distance had they been in the race. (Possibly due to drug taking, of course).

But then you look at Miguel Indurain, who won five in a row and didn't do accelerations - he did good time-trials and just rode tempo up the mountains, dropping off rivals one by one and just ignoring the occasional mountain attacks that came. So while it's been a rather boring Tour (well done Team Sky - seriously, that's a real achievement), Wiggo has won the Tour using a recognized, established tactic.

Anyway, presumably the knighthood follows shortly, and of course there's the Olympics in a few days, where Wiggins, Froome and Millar will work for Cavendish, who for a change won't be asked to carry bottles for everyone else. Still find it very hard to believe Cav is happy with this whole situation.

Next years Tour? Wiggins, Frooms and Cav all on different teams. Unless Wiggins sees the light and realises this, 2012, was HIS year (like 2011 was Cav's year), and he won't have another Tour like it. In which case he works for Froome, and we get another British winner next year.

Depending on Contador, Schleck (A) and the rest, of course, who should all be back...